Skip to Content
Odoo model · Enterprise

l10n.ch.tax.rate.import.wizard

Swiss Payroll: Tax rate import wizard. Defined in module l10n_ch_hr_payroll; exists in Odoo 18, 19, 20. Across the upgrade steps we tracked: 0 fields added, 0 removed, 0 renamed.

  1. Odoo 16 not covered
  2. Odoo 17 not covered
  3. Odoo 18 l10n_ch_hr_payroll
  4. Odoo 19 l10n_ch_hr_payroll
  5. Odoo 20 l10n_ch_hr_payroll

This is an Enterprise model: Odoo 16 and 17 Enterprise sources are not part of the data, so those versions show as not covered.

Odoo 17 to 18

Community only All changes in this step

Not covered: this step compares Community modules only and this model belongs to an Enterprise module.

Odoo 18 to 19

Community + Enterprise All changes in this step
1 views of this model removed
  • l10n_ch_hr_payroll_elm_transmission.view_l10n_ch_tax_rate_import_wizard_inherit

Odoo 19 to 20

Community + Enterprise All changes in this step

No change to this model's own fields in this step.

All fields declared on l10n.ch.tax.rate.import.wizard (5)

Fields this model declares itself in any version, with the versions they exist in. Inherited fields (mail.thread and other mixins) are on the parent model's page.

present not present not covered (Enterprise, Odoo 16 and 17)

Show all 5 fields
FieldTypeLabelModule1617181920
cantonselectionCantonl10n_ch_hr_payrollE
canton_modeselectionCanton Importationl10n_ch_hr_payrollE
import_modeselectionl10n_ch_hr_payrollE
tax_file_idsone2many ir.attachmentTax Filesl10n_ch_hr_payrollE
yearintegerTax Yearl10n_ch_hr_payrollE

Related models

Linked by its relational fields: ir.attachment

Coverage. Odoo 16 to 17 and 17 to 18 compare Community modules only (the Enterprise 16 and 17 sources are not available to us). Odoo 18 to 19 and 19 to 20 include Community and Enterprise modules. Everything here comes from a static read of the Odoo source code: a field counts as removed only when no parent model, mixin or delegated model still provides it. Fields created dynamically at run time can be missed, and entries we could not confirm are marked as low confidence.